News & Analysis 169995469_0e654875a1_b

Published on December 26th, 2012 | by EJC


The Humanitarian Impact Of European Laws Targeting Google News

This article was written by David Scales and John Brownstein. Originally published at PLOS Blogs on 19 December, 2012. Republished with permission.

David Scales and John Brownstein from HealthMap discuss why laws aimed at news aggregators will have an unintended impact on mapping emerging health threats.

On October 20, 2010, the HealthMap system detected a report about watery diarrhea in Haiti from Google News. Within 72 hours, HealthMap went live with a dedicated webpage mapping the spread of cholera there. Unfortunately it may not be possible to map future health threats so easily because some proposed European laws will increase the costs and erect barriers to such non-profit relief work if ultimately passed.

HealthMap and other non-governmental humanitarian efforts rely on Google News for data. Google’s free product collects news articles in newspapers, radio and TV from around the world and sends it electronically, making it cheap and easy to mine for information about infectious diseases like cholera or human rights abuses in Syria.

Yet this work is threatened by proposed copyright legislation that would raise costs and invite more red tape. On November 30th, the German Bundestag had its first reading of a draft law proposing to extend copyrights to require news aggregators like Google News or HealthMap to pay for access to articles. While proponents of the law state that Google should pay for linking to articles, dissenters see this as an attempt to prop up the failed business model of a declining industry. One critic, Jan Malinowski, the head of the Information Society Department at the Council of Europe, described these laws as the equivalent of “proposing policy measures to stop the industrial revolution in the interest of the equine trade.” France and Italy are contemplating emulating the draft German law and The Economist recently reported that Austria and Switzerland are considering doing the same.

Lost in this discussion are the potential unintended consequence of these laws. Media aggregation has become a well-established, powerful tool for the detection and monitoring emerging infectious diseases, monitoring conflicts and environmental disasters. For instance, the foremost existing surveillance of the crisis in Syria, Syria Tracker, also depends on the availability of news aggregation. Its strength is not in any individual article, but in their aggregation, creating a mosaic of risk that provides actionable intelligence to responders on the ground.

HealthMap, where we work, is among the leading epidemic detection technologies relying on secondary use of aggregated media information. We comb through thousands of articles a day, extracting those containing information on infectious diseases, and putting this information on a map – for free – at These laws would increase our costs dramatically. While a German publisher claimed that potential charges would be low, stating that “publishers don’t want to hinder aggregation; they want to foster it. The only thing we want to stop is aggregation at the price of zero.” Unfortunately, advocates of these laws do not seem to realize some of the most innovative aggregation, crowdsourcing and secondary use projects would be extinguished at any price. If we were required to pay for every article our technology combs through, paying a fraction of a cent per article would still put us out of business.

Indeed, our ability to gather infectious disease information has already been adversely affected by similar restrictions to Google News. Belgium has prohibited indexing of its newspapers by Google News since 2007. Recently, 150 of Brazil’s largest newspapers (making up 90% of the country’s circulation) also opted out of Google News. HealthMap has detected fewer epidemic events in Brazil and Belgium in light of these actions. This puts citizens in those countries unnecessarily at risk by compromising the flow of real-time information available to health officials and the public.

We are not the only ones facing this problem. While the potential price structure has yet to be released in any of the proposed laws, the costs of using media aggregation are likely to exceed the budgets of humanitarian organizations generating these data. Google has warned that if fees are charged in France it “would consequently be forced to stop indexing the French sites.” Some think Google is bluffing, that its deep pockets will enable it to withstand the increased costs. We will not be so lucky; neither will many others.

Malinowski warned that “caution to avoid otherwise unforeseen consequences should be in the second nature of policymakers.” If these draft European laws pass, data gathering during humanitarian emergencies will be even more difficult. Keeping these data open will not only foster innovation, but it could be vital to rapidly shepherding the right resources to the right place during a crisis. The draft German law explicitly states that it “should not be misunderstood as a protection offered by policy makers for an old-fashioned, obsolete business model.” Unfortunately, that is exactly what it seems to be.

About HealthMap:
HealthMap is a global disease alert surveillance system which monitors disease outbreak and emerging public health threats. By using Google Map, it aggregates and maps freely available data from various sources such as World Health Organisation, Google News and the US Geological Survey. For more about HeathMap, take a look at the below introduction video.


About the Authors:

David Scales is a medical sociologist and research fellow with HealthMap. He currently leads a project developing an online tool for users to do geographically based risk analysis incorporating information on demography, migration and infectious diseases. His research focuses on examining the relationship between new demographic indicators and infectious disease among foreign born populations in the US as well as analyzing HealthMap data to predict periods of higher and lower reliability. He wrote his dissertation on the International Health Regulations, pandemic influenza preparedness and the Codex Alimentarius, which are WHO regulations designed to prevent, contain or mitigate the effects of disasters and epidemics. This work led to writing a review of the impact of Codex governance procedures on developing country participation. With primary interests in infectious disease and international health, David completed medical rotations in Beirut, Lebanon and Kampala, Uganda. While at Yale, he volunteered as an Arabic translator at a refugee clinic and worked in student groups examining how intellectual property can serve as a barrier to accessing medicines and vaccines in resource-poor countries. 

John Brownstein (PhD) is an Associate Professor with the Center for Biomedical Informatics at Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Dr. Brownstein was trained as an epidemiologist in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at Yale University where he received his PhD. He completed his postdoctoral training at Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. He currently holds research grants from the National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Dr. Brownstein has advised the Institute of Medicine, the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Defense and the White House on real-time public health surveillance. His research has been reported on widely including pieces in Science, Nature, New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, National Public Radio and the BBC. Follow him on Twitter: @johnbrownstein 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

Comments are closed.

Back to Top ↑